1 hour ago
Saturday, 15 September 2012
New Film - 'TO ROME WITH LOVE'
The film consists of a quartet of stories (one of which itself splits into two), running concurrently, each going its own independent way, only joined together by being set in Roma. (Cue the usual touristy, but still ravishing, views.).
Funniest by far is the one in which Allen stars (with the wonderful Judy Davis) though even this strand is of diminishing returns, failing later to deliver the fabulous one-liners with which it begins so promisingly.
The second most interesting one is marred by the presence of Alec Baldwin who, after a promising opening appearance, develops into a muse-like figure, generously ladling out advice concerning romance and life to a new young male acquaintance who is hovering between keeping the affections of his current girl-friend and directing his attentions towards a new one with the arrival of his partner's friend (Ellen Page in fine, entertaining form here as the self-fixated Monica). It would have been better if the Baldwin character had just stopped interrupting an already interesting situation with his bon-mots and saws, which made me progressively more exasperated. (Allen again betrays his weakness for name-dropping high-cultural references - Kierkegaard, Rilke, Bartok, Strindberg, Yeats....... you know, the sort of names which pepper all our workaday conversations!)
The other two stories are much slighter - the one with Roberto Benigni essentially being a one-joke vignette which long outstays its welcome - and the final bi-furcated strand just left me baffled so that I wanted to re-wind to see again how each thread had started from the situation it was now in. With Penelope Cruz dazzling as a high-class prostitute there were some good moments, but not too many.
I do think the film would have been vastly improved by dropping the Benigni story completely, as well as Alec Baldwin's wise man act. It would have been a much sharper and, probably, funnier film. As it is the film's length is already 15 mins longer than Allen's usual crisp 90 minutes.
An even better idea might have been to have made a half-hour tale of just the Woody Allen episode - but, of course, there'd be no cinema market for that, even though it would undoubtedly have been more effective.
I tend to go into an Allen film with an at-the-ready smile on my face which, more often than not, delivers at least part of the promise. This does too, but not quite as much as I'd been hoping for.
If I was to be offered a gift of a boxed set of 20 Woody Allen films of my own choice (out of a current 45 to date, I believe), sorry to say that, despite some cracking lines, especially towards the beginning, this film would almost certainly not be on that list.
Verdict, (to be generous because, after all, it is Woody)......6.5/10
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
I see to have gone off Mr Allen as of late.... like you I once was hugely excited by his movies... especially with the likes of Sleeper,Hannah and Her sisters and the delightful radio daysReplyDelete
Now you're talking, J.G.! 'Hannah' is one of my all-time favourite films. It would certainly be in my ultimate Top 20.ReplyDelete
Yes, Woody has, in about the last 20 years, become so much of an unpredictable creator. In the 70s and 80s one would know beforehand that just about everything he did would be guaranteed to bring one immense degrees of pleasure. Since about 1990, some do some don't - and more's the pity that he's more adept at producing the latter. But he still does occasionally hit target. I did like his last, 'Midnight in Paris' a lot - and even 'Cassandra's Dream' - which critics seemed to loathe - as well as 'Match Point' and 'Melinda Melinda' having their very worthwhile moments.
But you are correct. There is now no more the certainty of truly great quality that we had in former times. Terrible shame.