(Better get this posting done quickly as, if I manage to see all the films I want to see in the next few days, then a log-jam on postings could arise. I saw this film on Monday afternoon, then blissfully unaware that when I got back home I was to be engulfed by computer troubles yet again.)
Straight to the point - I found this a splendid, bewitching film.
True, it doesn't have the visually epic scale of, say, David Lean's 'Doctor Zhivago', but the conceit of framing it in a live theatre (with occasional, very effective, 'openings-out') worked magically for me. Comparisons have been made with Baz Luhrmanns 'Moulin Rouge', (another film I loved) and I think they are justified to some extent, though that in no way detracts from this particular interpretation of a singularly weighty novel.
Some who know the original work might be put out by the whimsical manner in which the film opens. (The book is virtually devoid of any humour at all in its relentlessly serious 800+ pages!) But this is an interpretation - not a translation, and, even as an unashamed worshipper of the book, I found this angular perspective wasn't so misplaced as to jar.
Turning to the cast, I've read and heard that some reviews said that Keira Knightly misses the title character by a mile, and another which said that she got it exactly right. I concur with the latter view. She nails the flighty, adventurous yet guilt-ridden adulterous wife just as I see Anna.
Jude Law could not be improved on as the cuckolded husband. I don't think he's done better work on film. Here he gets to the essence of the character, with whom we can sympathise as the God-fearing, injured party, yet he also manages to bring a priggishness to his role that is spot-on with how Tolstoy sees him, resentfully smouldering to perfection. A marvellous portrayal!
Aaron Taylor-Johson (whose recent roles included the part of John Lennon in 'Nowhere Boy') plays Anna's lover, Vronsky, to my mind the least interesting of the book's half dozen or so main characters. Despite his dandyish portrayal I found the character on film also quite uninteresting, and one can only wonder what Anna saw in him to risk so much. But that too accords with my reading of Tolstoy's original.
Of course, a film of a mere two-hours must sacrifice the sweep of the book, but I think the heart and spirit of it has been admirably caught here.
Top marks go to screenplay-writer Tom Stoppard who accepts the challenge of condensing down this hefty tome, and he rises to the occasion with relish - and pulls it off with honours!
It would be invidious to neglect mentioning another source of my joy in this film, viz the music score of Dario Marianelli. Much above the plane of what we are so often served as background to historical dramas, it sounded very good and authentic without being over-distracting.
All this is not to say that the film is without faults. I think, for instance, director Joe Wright slightly over-plays the frequency of his requirement of background characters to 'freeze' their actions in statuesque poses, though it's not a major point of criticism.
Not everybody will like this film. Some may well detest it, especially those who have a reverence for its source material. But I'm among those who have the novel as one of their very favourite books of all time, and I found this project worked well-nigh perfectly in purely cinematic terms.
On the IMDb site, where 1/2 points are not permitted, I've given it a '9' - rare indeed for me.
If I score it half a point lower here that doesn't reflect any dissatisfaction at all - only that I allow myself the luxury of half-points - and out of the nearly 4.500 films I've seen to date, only a very tiny handful have scored that elusive, full 9 (and none have ever earned even a 9.5, let alone a perfect 10).
So, I'm more than pleased to award this 'Anna Karenina' an exceptionally worthy.............8.5/10.
3 hours ago
Ah, I saw this at the weekend and have been planning my own review...
ReplyDelete...pending that, I shall stay tight lipped here - although will come back and comment further if planned review fails to materialise!
Your review I simply MUST read, Andrew. I really can't wait. Already trying to read between your lines ("tight-lipped"? Hmmm. I wonder.) Don't keep us waiting TOO long, either on your own blog (far preferable) or back here.
DeleteReview now up!:
Deletehttp://oneexwidow.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/review-anna-kerenina.html
Thanks, Andrew. It's now been read and commented upon.
DeleteI am looking forward to seeing it. I've always been a sucker for costume drama and I almost always like Tom Stoppard's writing. Sounds like this one will be worth seeing. Thanks
ReplyDeleteThanks, H.K. I'm really keen to find out what you think.
DeleteI don't care if others actually hate the film (and there WILL be some). My views are the opinion of one person and could just as well be 'wrong' as 'right'. But I still want to know what others think. So do tell - on your own excellent blog or back here, I'll catch it.
So great that you were able to forget the stress you've been under and enjoy this film. I found it interesting that some critics said that Keira misses the mark and others say that she got it right. Just proves that everything is subjective and you can't please everyone. I was a little surprised that Jude Law played her husband. Shows how quickly time passes. A few years ago he probably would have been cast as Vronsky.
ReplyDeleteThe mention of Stoppard and the music score really makes me eager to see this. But it shows no sign of playing in my area or, for that matter, NYC which is only two hours away. I am totally frustrated!
Thanks, Paul, but I wasn't to know, when watching this film, that I'd get back home to yet another 3 days of stress!
DeleteI used to hate it a lot when I'd read reviews of film or theatre I so much wanted to see, when I was living in a place to where the production wouldn't come. For some years, although I still get that same feeling with the theatre, there's nearly always somewhere within travelling (or even walking) distance where I can see almost any film - the only limiting factor being the expense if I were to see them all.
So I can well understand your frustration at not being able to see 'Anna'. It will be a pity if you only manage to see it on a TV screen when, like the vast majority of films, it needs a cinema screen to give it scale which carries a visual 'punch'. I don't want to rub salt in the would but I do sincerely hope you catch it at some enterprising establishment. Do let me know when/if you manage to do so.
Every time I see a new rendition on this, I vow to read the book !
ReplyDeleteNow there you really do surprise me, Dr Spo. I'd have assumed that you, of all my blog-pals, would have not only read the novel but have been familiar with it. However, if you do see the film before reading, it might be worthwhile to read Andrew Brown's quite different take on the film (link to his blog is above, among his comments) and which gave me a very valid alternative perspective which I hadn't appreciated, but ought to have done.
DeleteI want very much to see this. I'm going to search for it. I hope I'm not too late!
ReplyDeleteHmmm, bad news for me. The film is not currently playing anywhere in the United States. I don't know if this means it has yet to be released here, or if it did so badly it only lasted a very short time before being pulled. I'm trying to get to the bottom (so to speak) of it.
Delete