Saturday, 18 May 2019

Eurovision Song Contest 2019 - Oh, what a circus, oh what a no-show!


And this year's major controversy is........


Maybe my screen had been too small to pick out that two of Madonna's backing dancers revealed (briefly) Israeli and Palestinian flags on their backs, this year's contest being held in Tel Aviv amid calls for a boycott, calls which eventually had close to nil effect. More of Madge in a mo.

Winner, the Netherlands. I'm pleased for the country, claiming its first victory in 44 years, bewildered as to why this song should have won - a plaintive ballad (stressing the plain!) with minimal, actually no stage effects. But there you are. What do I know? :-




The U.K., true to its form of recent decades, came last (out of 26), and that by some margin, the only injustice being that it didn't share the wooden spoon with 15 other songs to which I had also given a rating of 1 out of 5. After hearing it now five or six times I still cannot recall thee British entry one bit. You have to feel sorry for the plucky effort of 21-year old newly discovered 'talent' Michael Rice - or do I care? Not really:-

Second came Italy followed by Russia, another two which didn't impress me much - with Switzerland coming fourth - and in fifth place, the only one of the Top 5 which I rated at all, my placing of it being third, Norway:-


For much of the voting time what looked to be a front-runner was North Macedonia but, thank Heavens, fading right out of view as a result of its indifferent public support:-

And then the most talked about entry, Australia, with its coloratura soprano perched on a pole and swinging, as it were, in the wind, reminding one - okay, well me - of an horrific medieval punishment where the unfortunate victim of torture is impaled with a pole up his/her fundament and hoisted aloft for passers-by to gawp at and be considered lucky that it wasn't themselves who was up there. 

For a while during the run-up the song was beginning to grow on me, but then it struck - what song? Apart from the admittedly arresting 'hook' of the singer with the filigree vocals there was nothing much else to it, at least nothing I could recall. Maybe the idea of giving it such a spectacular presentation would mean that voters would be so transfixed by the visuals they'd overlook the non-entity of the song itself. It came in 9th place.

And I've got to put my cards on the table by revealing my own choices. I placed the toyshop-sweet and gently unassuming Denmark entry first - simple, non-derivative and memorable, it deserved far better than its moderately respectable 12th place :- 

In at second I'd have given it to the entertaining and catchy San Marino entry, but who, almost as bad as his turn in the semis, was hampered by a rasping, occasionally off-key voice, so unlike the professional video put out beforehand. Considering the reception he got, clearly a popular act, it was an injustice to see him languish ultimately in 20th place:-

And third, as I say above, I placed Norway.


During the interval we had the dubious pleasure of being presented with five previous winners singing each other's songs, a display to the eyes which one may, or may not, wish to embed in ones consciousness:-
You just may recognise on left a previous Austrian winner, Conchita Wurst, and second from right, Israel's 1998 winner, Dana International. 


Now to Madonna - and just what on earth was she wearing? Or is 'wearing' not a term which accurately describes what she threw on? Looking every inch like a granny who wants to show that she's still 'with it' (and that eyepatch, goodness me!) her first appearance where she was 'borderline' (yay!) rude, she made no effort to disguise the fact that she didn't want to be interviewed, probably because it was time wasted in not displaying her 'talent'. When it came to her star turn 'moment', commencing with an underwhelming presentation of her wonderful 'Like a Prayer' and surrounded by be-cowled, quasi- monk, backers, it segued into a brilliant display track from her new album 'Madame X' which more than made up for her lacklustre opening section. She showed what she's still capable of which, on this evidence, is one of extremes:-


The quartet of presenters were as maddening as ever, perhaps even moreso this year. So many "Are you READY?"s when we'd been on the edge of our seats for minutes on end! And when the 41 countries introduced their panels' votes in turn, one of those presenters kept greeting each one with a "Goodnight"! Wasn't there anyone who could be bothered to even tell him?

And thus it went. This year was not one that will be memorable to me for positive reasons, but is there ever a year that is? There'll be the regular calls from British sources saying that the U.K. should pull out of this annual display of mediocre rubbish because the world, and specifically anti-Brexit Europe(!), always fails to appreciate what amazing and superior talent 'we' possess!  Hmmmm! So will run comments from those who never watch Eurovision and detest the very idea of it anyway ("Those damned foreigners!")  - those who've never been bitten by the bug which dictates just how compelling this so-called 'nonsense' really is. Despite all the nay-sayers, I still declare - Long Live Eurovision!    


See y'all next year in Clogland!



12 comments:

  1. Madge is overrated and under-talented.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She was justifiably considered 'great' in her time, Bob, but that was long, long ago. However, last night she proved that she still has a spark of something in her, but you never know when it's going to show, or if it ever will.

      Delete
  2. Looked forward to seeing this spectacle, but unfortunately, it was not streamed in the US this year. Grateful for your thoughts.

    Yes, there are always maddening moments, but it is a good fun, escapist show.

    From the little that I've seen on YouTube, The Netherlands appears to be a good choice. Wish that the U.K. had done better.

    What did you think of Azerbaijan, especially after Chingiz did that HOT photo shoot?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great shame you weren't able to watch it in its entirety, Paul, preferably as it happened.

    The merits of the winning song just passes me by. Still can't see why it was deemed better than at least a dozen others, but that's my usual beef with nearly all the Eurovision winners for the last few decades so I'm not too fussed about it.

    Neither do I care much about any off-shoot of the U.K. disappointment (what's new?) - as long as young Master Rice doesn't do himself any injury after such abject humiliation. But the song was so uninspiring. (During the semis earlier in the week, at least two of the British commentators earnestly stated that the it COULD win. Yeah, right!)

    I've just had to check to remind myself which was the Azerbaijan entry - another rating of one out of five from me. The only thing commending it which appealed in this direction was the hottie performer, otherwise as forgettable as most of the others.

    It wasn't overall exactly the worst year I've ever seen but I don't think it could count as one of the better ones either.You'd have to delve back into the 90s or earlier to find one of those.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I voted for Denmark, I loved their quirky song.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're the only one I've heard of who also voted for 'the best one', Sue. Good to be on the same side as you.

      Delete
  5. Great review Ray! I am so pleased Australia didn't win with that utter nonsense. Norway and Switzerland were the best in the top five but I'm happy for Duncan; and happier that the contest will be in the Netherlands next year. There was over an hour between the last of the 26 songs and the start of the voting.... that needs tightening up!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, happy for the winning singer and the country but not the song itself, Chris. If it had been sung to represent one of the more eastern countries I would have felt really miffed, but as it turned out, to one where a win was long overdue, well I've no complaints about that aspect. Nonetheless, I'm still mystified as to quite WHY it should have won.
      I'm with you on all that needless padding between the last song and the start of voting results. Was it really necessary to allow so much time for viewers to vote? You'll have probably noticed that the whole thing over-ran its scheduled time by more than half an hour. I hope to see improvements next year, though not banking on it.

      Delete
  6. I have in the past felt annoyed when we have come last with what I thought was a decent song but this year I didn't care at all as I thought our song was uninspiring and mediocre. Dull and not catchy which I always think is needed. However I don't get why the winning song won as that was to me equally dull and mediocre. Usually the winning song is outstanding in some way by being different even plain odd and even if I don't like it I don't mind it winning but this was disappointingly dull in my opinion. I did think Australia was a bit ridiculous but they obviously went for the visual. I somehow missed Madonna, we did have family staying over and my two year old grandson, but seeing the photos I felt she looked ridiculous but then she often does. I agree that this year won't go down as memorable. You sum it up superbly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The U.K. entry was devoid of any 'hooks', Carol, which is an absolute necessity for any winner (though not this year!) and its dullness gave no surprise to its last place showing. I don't even know why it won the British stage. I didn't vote for it, though I forget which one I did prefer.
      I could say much the same about the winning Dutch entry which also remains a puzzle to me as to why so many thought it a great entry. Try as I can even now, after five hearings, I just cannot recall it.
      Missing Madonna was a mixed blessing for you. I must admit I did like the latter half of her act, including a duet with a rapper, but few others did. As for her prior interview where she couldn't wait for it be over and done with, she was just ill-mannered.
      I've seen worse Eurovisions but considerably more which were better.

      Delete
  7. I've never seen someone try so hard to be relevant and still miss the target by so far as Madonna has in the last decade. I don't get her EV appearance. Let the folks in the contest be the stars.......stop trying to grab whatever spotlight you have. And for the 100,000,000th time Madge, a red string on your arm does not make you Jewish.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She's degenerated into something between a curiosity and an embarrassment, B. Indeed some would say she's long been 100% the latter. High time she rode someone off into the sunset and to rest on her laurels (and they ARE considerable) rather than keep pushing what she doesn't have, which only overshadows and cheapens her past achievements. And for f*cks sake, keep out of the politics, you silly woman!

      Delete