Highly effective and tense heist thriller directed by the now justifiably renowned Steve McQueen, each of whose past full-length features (and there have only been three of them to date), have been remarkable in their own ways - '12 Years a Slave', 'Hunger' & 'Shame'. Now here, with his fourth, he does it again.
Based on (so I read) a late-1970s British TV serial by Lynda La Plante set in London, the action is here transferred to present day Chicago.
In the opening minutes we see a robbery in its late stages with four criminals led by Liam Neeson attempting a getaway, only to be confronted by police forces awaiting them, and perishing when their van, with the loot in back, goes up in flames, destroying everything inside.
Viola Davis, playing Neeson's widow, innocent of all knowledge of the robbery - and nearly always carrying around or has on a lead a small, white Scottish Terrier (No, it was actually a West Highland terrier, as pointed out by JayGee in comments below!) - she is 'visited' by a stranger who menaces her by giving her one month to make up the money his gang has lost. Quite why the robbery was enacted in the first place is not clear, suffice to say that the money route leads back to a corrupt mayor (Colin Farrell) on the eve of what he hopes is his re-election as the latest in a dynasty of mayors, with his ageing and disapproving father (Robert Duvall) ever hovering over.
One of the pieces that Davis' husband had left behind was details of another planned heist, and Davis has to convince two of the other widows (Michelle Rodriguez, Molly Kunz) following the same tragedy, to join her in saving her skin by acquiring money to give to the gang, whose leader (Daniel Kaluuya ('Get Out', 'Black Panther') is particularly terrifying. She ropes in a fourth, Elizabeth Debicki, as driver to complete the all-female criminal quartet.
The premise of the film is a good, unusual one which could have gone cheesy, but it doesn't. Likewise one might expect there to have been some scope for a few grim laughs, but there's none.
What needs must be mentioned is that there's quite a degree of sudden, heightened violence throughout the film which made me wince on each occasion, those moments coming as they do so unexpectedly. Also, about two-thirds through there's a breathtaking twist in the tale.
Although it's a very tense film I was put on further edge worrying about the fate of the dog which appears in a number of scenes, especially since the owner, Viola Davis, is being pressured to produce the money. For those who share my nervousness regarding animals on screen I can report that, apart from a brief moment when the dog is roughly lifted by the scruff of the neck, it doesn't come to any harm.
This film may turn out to be slightly less well regarded than McQueen's other works but it's far better than most in this genre. A rather strong stomach may be needed for some scenes though there's little over-dwelling on the bloody episodes. If you think you can handle it, it gets my clear thumbs-up.................7.
( IMDb.................6.9 / Rott Toms...............8.5 )
3 hours ago
I am a huge fan of Viola Davis and will see her in ANYTHING, so this is a must-see on my list.
ReplyDeleteYou're not going to feel let-down, Bob. I can promise you that.
DeleteI also like Rodriguez , so it's a plus for me ...
ReplyDeleteI didn't recognise her name, JayGee, but she certainly delivers.
DeleteI watched the original series in the 70.s and remember that I thought it was very good. I only now remember that the leader of the 4 women was called Dolly, an older lady and a very tough character. I will look forward to seeing this.
ReplyDeleteI didn't even have a telly 1975-78, Carol, if that was when it was broadcast. I'd be interested to know how that original looked like but it having been a serial takes off some of the intrigue for me. Obviously, for this 2-hour film a chunk of the material must have been pared down but it holds up very well nevertheless.
DeleteI think I may have it watched with my Nan who had a television before my mum did. The series covered them going on bigger and bigger jobs and the relationships between the women which were sometimes heated and sometimes compassionate. Oddly I don't remember how it ended. I will be interested to see this version.
ReplyDeleteMaybe on the strength of this film the original series will be available for viewing somewhere, Carol - unless it's another case of the tapes having been erased. If it does become so I wouldn't mind giving it a shot, and I'm sure I'd not by any means be alone.
DeleteI remember watching the original series and I still remember how good the actress who played Dolly was. She was one tough cookie! I have long forgotten her name, if I ever knew it. Lynda La Plante was a hugely popular writer back in the 70s and 80s.
ReplyDeleteI'm familiar with La Plante's name, Judith, though nothing else - and I've never seen or read anything by her. With this current topicality, high time for a catch-up methinks.
DeleteI have just googled the series and it was 1983 to 1885 so later than we thought which explains how I would have watched it (I was born 1960). There were actually two series. I read the reprise and now remember the twist! Still looking forward to seeing the film.
ReplyDeleteIn that case I did have a TV, Carol, a small (17"), black and white one, but never having been an avid TV watcher I'd not have been aware of the series. In the light of this recent film, though, I'd still probably give that old series a try.
DeleteIt was a west highland Terrier Raymondo xx
ReplyDeleteThanks. I'm none too hot on dog breeds, as you might have gathered. I've inserted a correction in the text.
Delete