Composer and performer, his talent loomed large in my life during the 1960s and (slightly) beyond - especially when I myself was aiming at becoming a songwriter, even though I never managed to get any of my own admittedly feeble attempts published.
Above - his appearance 20 years ago at London's Royal Albert Hall.
But I held his creative ability in awe around that time - his hit songs like 'Oh Carol', 'Breaking Up Is Hard To Do' 'Calendar Girl' 'Happy Birthday Sweet Sixteen' and so many more. (I only found out this morning that he'd penned the Connie Francis hit 'Stupid Cupid' when he was still in his teens!)
Then in following decades my respect for him dwindled, starting with his seemingly vehement (to me at that time) denial at rumours that he was gay, as though being so was 'shameful'. He had in fact been married to the same woman all his life since 1962, having with her a son and a daughter - and, though the rumours persisted there's been no significant evidence that he actually is/was gay, those stories perhaps fuelled that he at an early time composed collaborations with an 'out' gay young man, though nothing of substance other than that. So I now accept that he highly likely was hetero after all, despite my then annoyance at his apparent over-reaction to the possibility of his being 'other'.
(Now to follow, a bit of a diversion to a pet peeve of mine which, oddly, I have never heard discussed - on radio, TV or anywhere else at all, though it's bugged me for many decades........)
Perhaps more importantly to me personally than the above, in his composing work later in life Neil Sedaka became an enthusiastic advocate for something which I just CANNOT abide - specifically, putting words to themes written by great classical composers - a practice being utterly devoid of any respect for the intentions of the composer. Foremost is the perpetrators' all-consuming desire to earn money by riding on the backs of the deceased, using the latters' creations to get it, despite the severe mental 'disturbance' to admirers like me of the original, wordless work that its creator had intended. Once heard with words, near impossible to forget. Surely a form of mental 'abuse' for we listeners! Luckily, as far as I know, none of Sedaka's products of this type became well-known, and it's maybe just as well that I cannot name any songs of such - though I most definitely could point to a myriad of songs from other songwriters that do do just that, some of which became popular, both down the last half-century or more as well as even quite recent 'hits'. I suppose one of the most prominent examples of these travesties is the filmed musical (and occasionally still staged) 'Kismet, using the music of Borodin, some of which is so sublime, yet now with added words totally at odds with the (pre-word) music's emotions that poor Alexander B. must yet be turning in his grave! (They've also done the same thing with Grieg's music in at least two films). And one further illustration - probably the best known of all, the film and stage musical of 'Carmen Jones' where Oscar Hammerstein took whole swathes of Bizet's Carmen (which has been one of my own favourite of all operas) and replaced the original French words by his own (English, of course) so as now to involve the 'sport' of boxing instead of bull-fighting - though admittedly the original opera's subject is hardly any 'better'.
In all such cases, once one hears what may formerly have been incredibly uplifting and inspiring music, after words have been added all its original beauty has been utterly lost! And what's even worse - if such a thing is possible! - it often becomes an earworm! - impossible to listen to the original composition without the words coming back to haunt you. The supernal music of Chopin has been another victim of this practice, as has Rachmaninov's.
I shan't offer further examples because it might well make others unfamiliar with them curious enough to investigate and so to risk having a like experience of what for me, as an avid classical music lover, a bane imposed over a most valuable part of my life.
Anyway, I've gone to town on this subject when I hadn't intended to, but it really is a reflection of the degree of hostility on the subject I've always felt ever since I first became a convert towards classical music way back in my mid-teens.
So, as a final word, getting back to the late Neil Sedaka - a fond(ish) farewell to someone who absolutely was a giant of talent in my pre-20s years and onwards - and who, in spite of what I've written, I do still look up to. Thank you indeed, Sir!

He WAS a prodigy and truly gifted. I never knew about his vehement denials. I always expected that one day he would come out as gay. (He went to my high school, a long, long time before I was there).
ReplyDeleteHis contribution to pop music has been extraordinary, Mitch, though maybe not as much appreciated as he deserves.
DeleteI, too, always thought he was gay though I knew he was married ... like that makes a difference.
ReplyDeleteHe was a very talented man, though, so ...
RIP
Bob, to be 'fair'(?) to him, at that time being gay was generally looked on as a negative ("We poor unfortunates!") Thankfully, we've largely survived and come through all that rubbish - at least in our own respective countries.
DeleteWhile I wasn't familiar with his whole musical Library, I am familiar with quite a few of his songs and was shocked when I heard the news of his passing last night.
ReplyDeleteI'd be surprised, MM, if most of today's younger generations even know what his name means. Mind you, they probably don't know of the Beach Boys or even the Beatles! That's THEIR loss! :-)
DeleteI had "Oh Carol" sang to me many times growing up. I was shocked as he wasn't that old in our terms and it feels like all the people of our time are going. I felt a bit sad.
ReplyDeleteI'd never thought of that happening to others with your first name, Carol, but it must have run to countless girls of that time.
DeleteNowadays 86 isn't really THAT old, though in the 1960s it would likely have been regarded as extreme senility. However, still sad whenever it happens - and he was 'only' 6.5 years older than I am. (Eek!)
Best wishes as ever to you and yours. :-)
Oh, I thought he was 76, must have miss heard it. Not so bad then. My husband is 74 which is why I thought not that old, I am 66 in May.
DeleteOh, what I'd give to be back at your age again, you Youngster you! :-)
DeleteBreaking Up Is Hard to Do immediately ran through my mind when I heard he had died. Pretty sure young people literally have no idea who he was, sadly. But, I admit, I also did not know about his efforts at "reworking" classical pieces. And I'm not going to look them up.
ReplyDeleteHope you and your gang are doing well & staying safe!
Yes Elle, I've no doubt if his name is mentioned to most under, say, 50(?) a frequent response would be "Who?" When I first heard his 'Breaking up is....." I was knocked for six, especially with that double-tracking. I recall thinking "Just HOW do they do that?" But it's such a good 'tune' as well! (Though double-tracking had been operating much before he did it - for me even going RIGHT back to Teresa Brewer!)
DeleteI am fine thanks, better than most of my age - and my 'dynamic duo' are also fine, both now in late middle-age yet unfortunately still ever hostile to each other - and every night sharing my bed, one sleeping on each side of me, my turning over being a highly delicate manoeuvre which sometimes earns me a hissy snarl as warning!
I ardently hope that you are doing well, health-wise and other ways, as well as those close to you. Do keep safe yourself.
My adult second and teenage third cousins will hear a song from the 1950’s or 1960’s and think the songs are new !
ReplyDeleteRex in DC
That's a commendable attitude for them to have, Rex, even if they're not aware of it.
DeleteI used to follow 'pop' music avidly until about the turn of the millenium when I felt that I was getting so out of sympathy with then current music tastes that it was pointless to carry on. Maybe I should have persisted at trying to appreciate. But one thing I just don't get is how people can say they like a song when you can't understand what they're singing about, it being so indistinct with poor enunciation of the words.
Raymondo , I always mixed him up with gene pitney
ReplyDeleteReally? Pitney was, of course, the better singer with quite a vocal range, though I don't think he did much composing. These days I find it hard to distinguish singers apart, as well as groups, but that's because I don't try to. However, I do find a few present day acts quite watchable and listenable - Lady Gaga for inst. - and Harry Styles 'cos of his, well, style. And I've always been there with Kylie. Who hasn't?
ReplyDeletethat was a nice tribute; Good for you!
ReplyDeleteNot so sure myself. I wandered seriously off-course. But thanks anyhoo.
DeleteI couldn't have told you he was still alive.
ReplyDeleteNoticing which 'celebrities' have died is a reflection of how much they meant to one. In your case I imagine it's "not much".
Delete:-)
My first encounter with Sedaka was the song "Love will keep us together" sung by the Captain and Tenille." At the very end is the chorus "Sedaka is back" which everyone thought was so unusual. And speaking of earworms, I have a friend who says she had one for 14 years!
ReplyDeleteI didn't know the song you mentioned. H., it not having been a 'hit' here in any version, but I've just played Sedaka's own recording via Google. Hmmm, not bad.
ReplyDelete