This is a rattling good film. 
I
 tend to be wary of Spielberg as, for me, despite his mastery of the
 genre, his single greatest weakness is to lay sentiment on with a 
trowel such that it overwhelms all else. Not so here. Although he lets
 emotion have its head in the closing few minutes with a cosily 
reassuring domestic epilogue, as to the previous two hours and a 
quarter I was totally engrossed throughout. And all is achieved with no 
showy action sequences or special effects, and with a superior script 
whose writers include both the Coen brothers.
It
 starts in 1957 with the East-West Cold War now in full combative mode. In New 
York, a Russian man believed to be a Soviet spy is arrested (Mark 
Rylance - a major name in British theatre, with a fair bit of TV work 
also; less so in film up to now.). A private insurance lawyer (Tom 
Hanks) is roped in, reluctantly, by the CIA to defend the suspected spy,
 the American government wanting to keep their involvement in the Russian's defence at arm's 
length because of the politically sensitive nature of the case. 
After 
the trial an American pilot, Gary Powers, operating a spy plane over the
 Soviet Union is shot down and arrested, giving the Russians a publicity
 coup which they milk for all its worth. A situation of brinkmanship 
between the two major powers develops and Hanks is slated to arrange a 
spy exchange, though with a most unwelcome complication of an American student 
being arrested in Berlin by East German authorities just as the dividing
 wall is being constructed. 
The
 cast also includes, in a small role, Alan Alda as a CIA chief, now 
looking, sadly, very old (though he is now nearly 80!). The very few female 
roles are merely peripheral, the main one being the Hanks' character's wife, 
who has very little to say. 
I
 am old enough to recall the news of pilot Gary Powers being used as a 
bargaining tool by the Soviets, as well as the building of
 the Berlin wall, with heartbreaking scenes of desperate Germans living on the east side being shot in their vain attempts to escape
 over to the west, horrifically and tragically publicly bleeding to death on the razed 'no man's land' 
area near the wall. However, at the time I knew hardly anything of the the Russian guy, the Rylance role, being held by the Americans. 
The
 first half of the film is set in America; the second (in which Rylance only appears at the end) is in snowy Berlin, with the
 climactic spy exchange scene on a bridge. (Apparently Hanks' 
conspicuous sniffling cold throughout this second part was genuine.)
The
 film maintains its suspense throughout even though we can guess that 
it'll probably work out okay - and those of us who recall the actual 
news at the time know that it does. But it's still gripping stuff.
One of Spielberg's best in my view - and that's from someone who's only really
 liked a handful of his films - his very early ones and just a very few 
of his from the 90s and 00s. But this is certainly one to see....................8.

Giod review... Im seeing it tomorrow
ReplyDeleteIf you can try to forget what I've said, J.G., and go with low expectations, I think there's a likelihood that you'll enjoy it more. That's what I did. Hope you'll find it so too.
DeleteI'm with you about Spielberg and the "trowel," but I do enjoy a Tom Hanks film so this one goes on the list.
ReplyDeleteHanks always fits very comfortably into 'good guy' roles, Bob, (maybe because he seems in real life to be a genuinely good guy), and it's the same in this one, though his opening scene tries to undermine that. But as you're as much a fan as I am, this film is a 'must'.
DeleteI had originally dismissed the idea of seeing this Ray as I'm not a huge Spielberg fan. But the more I see and read of it, the more enamoured I am of it. Your review confirms it - I plan to see it.
ReplyDeleteAs an only sometimes Spielberg admirer (and usually not) I do stick my neck out to recommend this one, Craig. It doesn't look all that promising on paper but it comes up a good 'un.
Delete