Tuesday 10 May 2016

Film: 'Florence Foster Jenkins'


This film held a great deal of promise to me - and if, ultimately, it didn't quite reach the heights of unalloyed delight that I was hoping for, it missed it only by a fraction.

Unlike the recent French film 'Marguerite' which tells basically the same story though with fictional French characters, this Stephen Frears film attempts something nearer the truth - and I can believe that it's achieved it. It's certainly more multi-layered and touching than the other film.

Set in New York in the early 1940s (with Liverpool very credibly standing in for that city) it's the real-life account of the title character (played by Meryl Streep) who, deluded that she has a great singing voice when in fact it's hopelessly inaccurate and off-tune, she decides to embark on a career of professional classical concerts, culminating in an appearance at Carnegie Hall, which also turned out to be her last public engagement, she dying the very next month in 1944. Throughout her ambition she is resolutely supported by her English husband (here Hugh Grant) who does all he can to shield her from the truth and from others opinions. Suffering throughout this ordeal is her pianist, played by Simon Hellberg, whom I didn't know before, but I now read that he's a regular on TV's 'The Big Bang Theory', unseen by me.

It would have been so easy to portray Jenkins as little more than a vocal 'freak' whose entertainment value lies only in the laughs she evinces when 'singing', but this film is rather more profound than simply that. The emotional ranges which both Streep and Grant are required to display is quite wide. La Streep does what she seems capable of doing more than just about any other contemporary actress - making each part that she plays utterly different from anything that she's done before. There isn't the slightest hint in her performance here of any previous roles, she so submerges herself in this one. Totally extraordinary.   
I was no less impressed by Hugh Grant, and I'd have to agree with those reviewers who opine that he's never been better than in this film. He's acquired something of a reputation as being a one-note actor (that note being one to which I've always taken kindly, he being always very watchable in my books) but here his acting capabilities come to the fore - including dancing (here in jitterbug-type style), a requirement he actually hates to do, though one would never have guessed it. I found the relationship between him and Streep very moving indeed.

I've not seen every single one of Stephen Frears' films but I have seen most of them, and I can state that I don't think that he's ever made a dud - many of his films actually being not just very good but intensely memorable too. This film joins that august line.

I've been aware of Jenkins since the 1960s when I was still at school and then having no interest in classical music. Because I wanted to have a certain two classmates as friends, two boys who sounded so learned talking about the subject during recreation breaks, I started force-feeding myself with 'serious' music in order to emulate them and have a reason to converse. It was just by chance that one day, on the BBC classical music network from where I gained my knowledge, they happened to play one of Jenkins' recordings - and once heard, it's never forgotten. That experience lodged in my memory for the rest of my life. 
She's rarely mentioned nowadays if at all, at least until this film and 'Marguerite' - so I'd imagine that a lot of today's audience won't have been aware of her before now.

I can't quite put my finger on why this 'Florence Foster Jenkins' falls just the tiniest bit short of my highest hopes and expectations. Perhaps it'll come to me later. However, I haven't the slightest hesitation in recommending this film - and if you're as much as a Meryl S. fan as I am, it's positively unmissable................7.5.

12 comments:

  1. I am a HUGE Meryl fan, and I love a Stephen Frears endeavor, so I'm gonna see this one when it comes to a theater near me!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know you're a Meryl fan of the first order, Bob, and you won't be let down by this. She absolutely nails it, as she does for any role. If she was the only positive point about this film, though that's far from the case, it would be worth seeing it for her alone.

      Delete
  2. oh ! this is one I want to see.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And I fully expect you to be giving it a rightful thumbs-up.
      The Jenkins story is virtually unknown here and I wonder if it's also the case in America. I would imagine it's similarly little heard about, but if anyone at all is familiar with it I'd expect you to be one of the few.

      Delete
    2. The classical radio station plays her arias every 1 April.

      Delete
    3. That's a good idea, though I guess it's only so that she can be laughed at - hence the date. Since that first time I heard of her quite by chance in the 60s, I doubt if I've ever heard her mentioned more than twice in all that time.

      Delete
  3. What I love about streep is that you can almost see her thinking as she acts......but thinking as the character thinks...you can SEE IT
    I can only explain it in this way

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, exactly. In a very slightly different way from what you say, I always think that the words that come out of her mouth don't at all sound as if they were scripted, but rather precisely what that character actually would have said in the circumstances. In that manner I find her pretty well unique in our current acting world - and it's this allure that makes all her appearances such a compulsive watch.

      Delete
  4. I know this is late but...spouse and I and janey went to see FFJ today...a delight and 3 thumbs up from us!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm very pleased indeed that you saw it, A.M., and also rather relieved that you enjoyed it. It would have been miserable if you'd fund the experience a waste of time.
      It didn't do quite as well at the box office here as was hoped, which is most disappointing, partly I think because the lady's name is virtually unknown here, even though I'd been aware of her.
      I do hoe t does better in other countries because it really deserves to.
      But I'm very content to read that you and hubby got satisfaction and more out of it.

      Delete
  5. I'm glad you enjoyed this one. I found it warm, loving, courageous and quite entertaining. It was a welcome breath of fresh air.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is certainly different, F.B., and none the worse for being that. Meryl S was every bit as good as we've come to expect, though when is she not? However, I'd have to hand the 'surprise' accolade to Hughie G. who's never been so impressive as he is here. He's nominated for a BAFTA at tonight's ceremony though his starring role is sure to be unfairly eclipsed by films that have attracted more attention than this unique story.

      Delete