Thursday 28 March 2013

Film: 'TRANCE'

(It's been longer than it should have been since my last seen film. In the interval a number have come and gone which I'd like to have seen. A major reason for missing them was preferring not to venture out during our prevailing weather, this having been our coldest March for 50 years, with nightly frosts and daytime temps still scarcely above freezing. And there's still no sign of the end of it!)


Any Danny Boyle film is an 'event' - he of 'Shallow Grave', 'Trainspotting', '28 Days Later', 'Slumdog Millionaire', '127 Hours' as well as, of course, last year's Olympic Games opening ceremony.
This latest of his has had a somewhat cooler reception than some of those I've mentioned, at least among those critics I've seen. I would tend to concur with them.

James McAvoy (of whom, must admit, I'm not particularly an admirer) plays an auctioneer who is involved with a criminal gang to steal a Goya from public auction rooms while an auction is in progress. During the crime he receives a knock on the head which renders him incapable of remembering what he's done with the painting. The gang leader (Vincent Cassel in convincingly 'nasty' mode) after a violent preamble, decides to send him to a hypnotherapist to recover his memory of the object's location.

As so often recently I did find the first 2/3 of this film very entertaining. The premise was simple and unusual. But then the convolutions start, the big revelation being that McAvoy's character's recollection of the crime and the reasons for it were not as he thought they were. The past is re-written in hindsight for his benefit as well as for our own. I suppose the film's intention is to have the audience gasping with the surprises, though I dare say that many people will have guessed the 'biggie' reveal before I did. I just found them increasingly irritating. It's yet another of the spate of films where reality and happenings in the mind are deliberately ambiguous or confused, a feature which has become a bit of a cliche now.
I found the fault of this film lies more with the writers than with Boyle himself, who can be guaranteed to provide slick direction, always with frenetic energy. He's one of those few directors who never bores me. But in this film he's going along with a storyline which I felt that even he was only half-convinced by. (There are, predictably, a number of very violent moments, though all very brief).

A bit of a disappointment, then. As I write this, the average score on IMDb site is 7.7, so clearly many others have a higher opinion of it than I have, my rating being a..................

7 comments:

  1. I had a feeling that this might be a bit of a damp squid Ray. I've seen James McA in very few films but I loved him in Atonement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Craig and ray....I think he's a bit of a dish x

      Delete
    2. Craig - I see from this morning's reviews that I'm not alone in my disappointment. J McA was okay in 'Atonement' though I thought the film as a whole was remarkably good, better than any one actor. (Incidentally, if you remember the scene on the beaches of northern France - featuring the particularly distressing 'execution' of horses - that section was actually shot within a couple of miles of from where I come from, on the north-east England coast.)

      J.G. - Yes, I know he has a bit of a following though I don't see why. He always seems to me to be rather colourless, though I've not seen him at length in interviews outside his film work. Maybe I'll warm to him over time, as I've done with others, Matt Damon, for instance.

      Delete
  2. I was hooked on James when I saw and heard him talking about this release on "The Graham Norton Show." Love his accent -really gets to me. Can you continue your review and tell us about the scene with James's bum?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Paul as you can see in my comment immediately above, I've so far been immune to his 'charms' - but I'm open for the magic to work. (I don't watch Graham Norton any more, only because it's too much trouble to get it up on 'playback' - the actual broadcast itself is on far too late for me to catch).
      As for his rear end - oh, you mean THAT scene, where he screws his (spoiler alert!) hypnotherapist - (female, alas!), I'd just about forgotten it, and even now it's a struggle to bring it to mind again. :-)

      Delete
  3. Longer than it should have been since your last seen film? I sit and wait for all your recommendations to come out on video. The only way I seem to see anything! Thanks for this review. Will probably skip this!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mine is only a personal reaction, Mitch. You're welcome to add my thoughts into the general mix but majority opinion seems to be that this film deserves more praise than I've accorded it. But pleased to be of 'help' anytime.

      Delete